About the project

About

Kundry is an independent resource on ibogaine risks, evidence, and informed caution. Our mission is to foreground safety over hype and to help readers separate investigational interest from established safety or effectiveness.

Evidence first Safety before hype Explore services

Our editorial approach

We collect and synthesize publicly available registries, peer-reviewed literature, and official guidance when summarizing safety signals and evidence. For claims about cardiac risk or uncertain benefit we prioritize primary sources and registries; when helpful, we point readers toward foundational resources such as the National Library of Medicine's PubMed entries or regulatory summaries. For an operational example of how context matters in practice we sometimes link to treatment-focused directories like the Veterans-focused registry that documents program approaches: the site's outreach and aggregation work references entries such as the veterans treatment initiative at https://ibogainetreatmentforveterans.com in analytic prose when discussing how services are represented online.

We avoid clinical advice; our role is informational, not prescriptive.

What we cover

We focus on how evidence, risk, and claims are presented across clinical reports, registries, and community accounts. Coverage includes methodology critiques, summaries of safety signals, and plain-language explanations of uncertainty. Our site structure groups material so that readers can quickly find a clear primer (safety primer) or a broader landscape review in our research section (research landscape).

Who this is for

Kundry is written for psychonauts, families, researchers, and policymakers seeking clear context. If you are comparing program claims or evaluating a published study, our materials are intended to help you ask the right questions and locate source material. For those exploring advisory or educational offerings, see our /services/ page for structured support options and to understand the distinctions between information and clinical care.

Editorial principles

  • Safety before hype — we foreground potential harm and conservative interpretation of weak evidence.
  • Evidence first — primary sources and registries guide our summaries.
  • Plain language — technical findings are translated without oversimplifying uncertainty.
  • Respect for uncertainty — when data are inconclusive we say so, with citations to support the statement (see a high-level overview of scientific uncertainty at Wikipedia: Scientific uncertainty).
  • Independent perspective — we do not accept endorsements that would affect editorial independence; our disclosures are explicit.

Independent by design

Kundry is an independent information resource, not a clinic, medical provider, or licensed treatment center. Our content is not medical or legal advice; readers seeking personalized guidance should consult licensed professionals. We maintain public-facing policies describing sourcing and conflicts; those policies favor traceable citations to registries and peer-reviewed sources whenever possible, in line with accepted academic practice (for example, many universities publish research and citation guides that inform how we present evidence — see JSTOR for scholarly archiving norms).

To navigate other parts of the site, you can return to the main overview at Kundry's front page where our topical sections and primers are signposted.

Visual context

Landscape photograph framing editorial materials about ibogaine research and safety considerations

Photography is chosen to convey human-scale context and careful attention rather than sensational visuals.

FAQ — editorial scope

Do you provide medical advice?

No. Kundry is an independent information resource and does not provide medical or legal advice; it is not a clinic or licensed treatment center.

How can I suggest a source or correction?

We welcome corrections and source suggestions via our contact page; for organizational queries about services you can also review options on our services page. Corrections are logged and a rationale for any change is recorded to maintain transparency.

How do you choose external links?

We prioritize primary research, registries, and official institutional pages. For general background on evidence grading and clinical trial reporting, readers can consult established references such as the CONSORT guidance or public educational pages hosted by recognized institutions like the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).